Courtroom Truths

The Exceptions School · Chapter 9 of 15

Questions She Will Not Answer

By My Life Story Editorial · Published · Updated

The visiting room at the federal facility near Bellweather, Maryland, had the particular quiet of a place built to discourage conversation rather than invite it. Della's attorney sat beside her, a legal pad angled so I couldn't read it, and told me twice before we started that his client would answer no question touching the pending charges.

Della looked older than the photograph in her personnel file, thinner through the face, but she sat the way I remembered her sitting in a classroom twenty years earlier, back straight, hands folded, waiting for someone else to finish talking.

"I want to ask about the exception practice," I said. "Not what you did with it. How it worked. How someone requested a file outside the normal channel, and who signed off."

Her attorney leaned forward. "That goes to method, which goes to conduct. We're not discussing conduct."

"I'm not asking her to confirm anything happened," I said. "I'm asking how the mechanism functioned, as a training matter, for people who were never charged with anything."

Della's eyes moved to Inez, then back to me, and for the first time since we'd sat down something in her face shifted, not toward an answer but toward recognition. "You still teach the yellow folder example," she said. "The late report."

"I do."

"I remember when you wrote that into the manual. You asked me what I thought of it." She said this flatly, an observation and nothing more, and did not say what she had thought of it then or thought of it now.

"What did you tell me?"

Her attorney put a hand briefly on her forearm. She didn't need it; she had already declined to answer, and the refusal looked practiced, worn smooth by the weeks since her arrest and whatever advice she had received in rooms I had never entered.

"I'm not going to help you write your report," she said. "I don't owe the agency an education on its own procedures."

"You might owe it to the people who'll sit in those classroom seats in September," I said, and heard how much that sounded like something I would have told a student, not a woman facing fifteen potential counts.

"That's not my problem to solve, Calum." It was the first time she'd used my name, and she said it the way you'd close a door, not slam it, just close it, firmly, so there would be no mistaking that it was shut.

I asked three more questions, differently worded, hoping one would open some crack she hadn't anticipated. Had she ever flagged the mechanism as a risk to a supervisor. Had anyone ever flagged it to her. Had she known, in 1993, what the closure code on the routing sheet actually meant.

To each she gave the same answer, delivered through her attorney in slightly different phrasing: no comment responsive to that question at this time.

Inez took notes throughout without asking anything herself, which I understood only later as a kind of discipline, a refusal to let the interview become two investigators pressing one defendant instead of one examiner conducting a documented interview for the record.

On the drive back to Alderwick, Virginia, neither of us said much. The dogwoods along the access road had come out since the last time I'd made this drive, and I found myself watching them instead of talking, trying to let the ninety minutes settle into something other than failure.

"You expected more," Inez said finally.

"I expected something. I don't know what I expected." I thought about the classroom, the manual open on the instructor's table, Della's flat observation that I still taught the yellow folder example. "I think I wanted her to tell me the mechanism was always broken, so the rest of this would feel like discovery instead of indictment."

"It is discovery," Inez said. "She just isn't the one doing it."

Back at the office that evening I pulled up the draft section I'd written the week before, four paragraphs under the heading Subject's Likely Motivation, built mostly from secondhand characterizations and my own guesswork about what twenty-five years of trusted access might do to a person's sense of entitlement or grievance.

I read it twice, then deleted all four paragraphs and typed a single sentence in their place: The subject has declined to provide a substantive account of her motives or of the exception practice's operational history, and none is independently established by the record reviewed to date.

It felt like admitting something, not about her, about the report, about what an honest document could actually claim to know. I saved the file and did not reopen it that night, though I kept turning over her voice saying my name, the door closing, exactly as gently and exactly as finally as she'd intended.

✦
YOUR CHOICE

Cookie preferences

Read and listen either way. You can change your choice at any time using the link in the footer.

Essential & reading preferences

Remember this choice and the bookmarks, text size and listening settings you choose. Also supports security and publisher sign-in.

Always available

Help us understand story visits, chapter progress and listening using a random browser identifier. No advertising trackers are enabled.

Your choice lasts 180 days on this browser and this website. Read our privacy policy.